MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
xacml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] E-mail vote results
here are my thoughts:
1. the reason that i proposed that we not use java syntax is that it
will make XACML dependent upon a vendor specific language. while i like
java i don't think that this is a good thing.
2. describe 'java-like' -- how does this differ from 'pseudo code'? my
thinking is you are either [fill in the blank with language of choice]
compliant or you have a homegrown solution. the concern i have with a
homegrown solution is that we now become the authority for the
associated syntax. maybe our requirements are simple enough that this
isn't an issue. i suggest that maybe we should discuss what we perceive
to be the *reasonable* scope for this before proceeding?
b
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 08:57, ernesto damiani wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am also not convinced about the choice of OCL. I understand current
> discussion implies we abandoned the idea of Java-like syntax, though
> apparently I was off the list during the debate. Anyone willing to comment
> on why?
> rgds
> ernesto
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC