OASIS eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) TC

Classified as: {OPEN}   Hello, since Open Policy Agent was mentioned on xacml lists, and presented to the XACML TC a while ago, I thought you might be interested: recently I looked at their documentation Comparison to other systems , which compares OPA to XACML, among others, and noticed the XACML policy given as example was quite wrong/obsolete (using a mix of old XACML 2.0 and XACML 3.0, and other issues). So I have fixed it in a PR on the OPA github: https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/pull/6438   But if you find other issues in their XACML comparison, feel free to do a pull request on their github. This worked well for me.   Kind regards, Cyril   {OPEN}

Just saw this (growing number of messages from the TC list are ending up in my Spam folder :-/)

Very nice!

b

> On Dec 1, 2023, at 5:21 AM, DANGERVILLE Cyril <cyril.dangerville@thalesgroup.com> wrote:
>
> Classified as: {OPEN}
>
> Hello,
> since Open Policy Agent was mentioned on xacml lists, and presented to the XACML TC a while ago, I thought you might be interested: recently I looked at their documentation Comparison to other systems <https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/comparison-to-other-systems>, which compares OPA to XACML, among others, and noticed the XACML policy given as example was quite wrong/obsolete (using a mix of old XACML 2.0 and XACML 3.0, and other issues). So I have fixed it in a PR on the OPA github:
> https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/pull/6438
>
> But if you find other issues in their XACML comparison, feel free to do a pull request on their github. This worked well for me.
>
> Kind regards,
> Cyril
>
> {OPEN}

Just saw this (growing number of messages from the TC list are ending up in my Spam folder :-/) Very nice! b On Dec 1, 2023, at 5:21 AM, DANGERVILLE Cyril <cyril.dangerville@thalesgroup.com> wrote: Classified as: {OPEN}   Hello, since Open Policy Agent was mentioned on xacml lists, and presented to the XACML TC a while ago, I thought you might be interested: recently I looked at their documentation   Comparison to other systems , which compares OPA to XACML, among others, and noticed the XACML policy given as example was quite wrong/obsolete (using a mix of old XACML 2.0 and XACML 3.0, and other issues). So I have fixed it in a PR on the OPA github: https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/pull/6438   But if you find other issues in their XACML comparison, feel free to do a pull request on their github. This worked well for me.   Kind regards, Cyril   {OPEN}