Thanks, Lucía makes sense I really wonder that we haven't been calling out CMS integrations will put it prominently and also will strive to normalize capitalization. I am not aware of any literature on the rendering topic. It's a brand new trend According to Felix, MathML should have produced something WRT their browser rendering, others like us just started wondering that it would be good to have standardized rendering provisions.. Cheers dF Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez <
Lucia.Morado@unige.ch > wrote: Hi David, I have just reviewed the previous CFP , and I have two suggestions: 1) Under “Implementing XLIFF 2.x”, we could add one topic related to CMS, for example, something general as: CMS and XLIFF 2.x or XLIFF 2.x support in CMS 2) The capitalization needs to be normalized. See for example: Reference I mplementations and Statements of Use for XLIFF 2.1 vs Experimental i mplementations of XLIFF 2.1 Another thing, at the end of the meeting, you mentioned some work being done on XLIFF rendering, do you have more details on that? Is there something already published that I can consult? Best, Lucía