MQTT SN Subcommittee

Dear co-editors, chairs, and members, at the original place I did a lot of suggestions to fix the format. But, as this is not clear, how it looks without accepting all these changes anyway, I went ahead and created a copy (with the -trial postfix) accepted  all these formal changes (no semantics) plus some nits ... I set the editor permissions to all people on the original. Google forced me to write something in a note, which I did but then forgot as I also initially forgot to add Andrew (sorry did afterwards silently). Also, every person known or guessing the link has viewer permissions (like with the document I forked off from). Oh, the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RWp7ZSuidjIz8lsC8hMag6ZQWR8-_PHP/ @Ian: and the sidebar has section numbers (and the correct numbers). PS: Please remember that unfortunately I cannot join the meeting tomorrow, as I have to support my new Co-editor in SARIF in the meeting at the same time ... any errors or gestures of appreciation have to go via email or wait until we meet again. PPS: @Davide - can we maybe have a short cleanup editor session (where we organize the agreed stuff and assign some legwork among the Swiss fraction) ... so that the next full meeting/workshop can profit from less clutter? Cheers, Stefan. --- Stefan Hagen, Emmetten, Nidwalden, Switzerland. read: https://stefan-hagen.website write: stefan@hagen.link

Thanks for the work done! Please propose a couple of slots for the cleanup session. Today from 10 to 11:30 or from 12:30 to 14:30 or from 15:00 to 16:00 CET will work for me. Tomorrow anytime before 17:00 CET will work for me. Bye Davide   From: Stefan Hagen <stefan@hagen.link> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:14 PM To: mqtt-sn@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: Ian Craggs <icraggs@gmail.com> Subject: Fixed format - updated outline working draft clone available   You don't often get email from stefan@hagen.link . Learn why this is important **** This is an EXTERNAL email. It was sent from outside of u-blox. **** Dear co-editors, chairs, and members,   at the original place I did a lot of suggestions to fix the format.   But, as this is not clear, how it looks without accepting all these changes anyway, I went ahead and created a copy (with the -trial postfix) accepted  all these formal changes (no semantics) plus some nits ...   I set the editor permissions to all people on the original.   Google forced me to write something in a note, which I did but then forgot as I also initially forgot to add Andrew (sorry did afterwards silently).   Also, every person known or guessing the link has viewer permissions (like with the document I forked off from).   Oh, the link:   https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RWp7ZSuidjIz8lsC8hMag6ZQWR8-_PHP/   @Ian: and the sidebar has section numbers (and the correct numbers).   PS: Please remember that unfortunately I cannot join the meeting tomorrow, as I have to support my new Co-editor in SARIF in the meeting at the same time ... any errors or gestures of appreciation have to go via email or wait until we meet again.   PPS: @Davide - can we maybe have a short cleanup editor session (where we organize the agreed stuff and assign some "legwork" among the Swiss fraction) ... so that the next full meeting/workshop can profit from less clutter?   Cheers, Stefan. --- Stefan Hagen, Emmetten, Nidwalden, Switzerland. read: https://stefan-hagen.website write: stefan@hagen.link