MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] Proposed semantics for operations involving	INDETERMINATE




From: bill parducci <bill@parducci.net>
To: xacml <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 13:53:22 -0700






> B.  urn:oasis:names:tc:XACML:0.15i:operators:or
> 
>     1) Order of evaluation: not specified.  Operands may be
>        evaluated in any order.
>     2) When does evaluation terminate: when any one of the
>        following conditions holds:
>        a) One evaluated operand returns TRUE
>        b) All operands have been evaluated.
>           i)  And at least one operand returned INDETERMINATE
>           ii) And all operands returned FALSE
>     3) What result is returned:
>        2a)   TRUE
>        2bi)  INDETERMINATE
>        2bii) FALSE

2bi seems to contradict 2a. in the case where i have 

<or>
  1=1 (T)
  1=2 (F)
  1=fred (I)
</or>

i can yield T (2a) or I (2bi). may i suggest that 2b read:

b) NO evaluated operand returns TRUE
   i)  And at least one operand returned INDETERMINATE
   ii) And all operands returned FALSE


b









Follow-Ups:

Re: [xacml] Proposed semantics for operations involving	INDETERMINATE
From: Anne Anderson <Anne.Anderson@Sun.com>



References:

[xacml] Proposed semantics for operations involving INDETERMINATE
From: Anne Anderson <Anne.Anderson@Sun.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]


  









Powered by eList eXpress LLC