OASIS eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) TC

Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

RE: [xacml] [f2f] facility findings

  • 1.  RE: [xacml] [f2f] facility findings

    Posted 12-11-2001 13:06 
     MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

















    xacml message
    







    [Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]
    


    







    Subject: RE: [xacml] [f2f] facility findings
    







    



    Title: RE: [xacml] [f2f] facility findings
    






    Hi,

    


    I'm personally fine with either choice.  However, according to these two investigations, Bill's proposal sounds potentially cheaper and easier.  I agree that booking 5 rooms shouldn't be difficult (although we'd better confirm this before Bill finds himself on the hook for the cost!).  As for lunches, if someone or a few people want to pick this up, that would be great.  But I see no problem with "no-host" at the lobby or a nearby restaurant.
    


    This all sounds very promising.  Can we get some feedback from others regarding this date at the LAX Hilton?  Will a substantial number of people be able to make this meeting?
    


    Carlisle.


    

      

      ----------
      From:   Ken Yagen[SMTP:kyagen@crosslogix.com]
      Sent:   Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:51 PM
      To:     'bill parducci'; xacml list
      Subject:        RE: [xacml] [f2f] facility findings

      


      I checked into it here as well. CrossLogix won't be able to sponsor a meeting, but could make arrangements at the same location as last time (Sofitel) if others pitched in. The LAX Hilton doesn't sound too bad and makes it easy to fly in and out to the meeting. I'm sure booking 5 guest rooms wouldn't be an issue for the meeting given that everyone except Bill would be flying in.
      


      Ken Yagen 
      Director, Software Development 
      CrossLogix, Inc 
      www.crosslogix.com 
      �


Related Content