MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl-ndrsc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] UBL: question on CCT language component




From: Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
To: "CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:02:27 +0800






I cannot find where it says they are indicator. Content???  di you mean Identifier. Content?

In the data model i derived fro the tables in 8-1 and 8-2, you will see that both Language.Identifier and Language.Locale.Identifier are Identifiers and therefore have an Identifer. Content (ie xsd:token).

This conundrum exposes the 'flat' structures we have built for CCTs and Rep. Terms , when they should have been more sophisticated.  That is, we should have had things like...

<Language>
<Identifier>
<Content>
EN
</Content>
</Identifier>
<LocaleIdentifier>
<Content>
US
</Content>
</LocaleIdentifier>
</Language>

where the schema reflects the true structures of the CCTs and not the table


CRAWFORD, Mark wrote:

>Anne,
>
>Language supplementary components are of indicator. Content.
>Mark Crawford
>Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
>W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
>Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
>Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
>Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
>______
>Logistics Management Institute
>2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
>(703) 917-7177   Fax (703) 917-7481 
>Wireless (703) 655-4810
>mcrawford@lmi.org
>http://www.lmi.org
>"Opportunity is what you make of it"
>
>
>