OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC

 View Only

  • 1.  Capabilty type syntax

    Posted 12-02-2024 12:11

    I really hope I'm wrong here but it appears to me that there is an error in the syntax specification of capability-type in CSD-07. Section 8.2 says that 'type' is mandatory but as we no longer have a base profile there is no valid type name that can be supplied for the value of type. I think it should be optional.

    Furthermore, for consistency 'type' should be 'derived_from'.



    ------------------------------
    Paul Jordan
    Paul Jordan (Personal)
    Woodbridge
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Capabilty type syntax

    Posted 12-02-2024 14:04

    I may be looking at the wrong section, but 8.2 defines "capability definition", not "capability type". For capability definitions, the "type" is absolutely mandatory. For capability refinements (in 8.2.1) the type is optional.

     

    Is this inconsistent with your understanding?

     

    Thanks,

     

    Chris

     




    Original Message


  • 3.  RE: Capabilty type syntax

    Posted 12-02-2024 14:19
    Yes of course, I just realized my error. So glad I was wrong.


    Original Message


Related Content