Data Provenance (DPS) TC

 View Only
  • 1.  Chicken/Egg on getting draft text started

    Posted 05-03-2025 09:47

    OASIS is updating its templates and we are sort of stuck in a chicken/egg situation. I recommend reading https://groups.oasis-open.org/discussion/markdown-version-of-cscsd-template and looking at the example. We can help them get it straightened out by going ahead and starting to use it even if it isn't done yet. I think it's important that we start getting text "on paper" (ie agreed to) so we can work out where we have issues that need to be worked.

    Any objections to my making a PR to 'start' the metadata spec 'ahead of time' (since we don't have the official template yet). Obviously it will just be a PR and people can vote against it if they don't like it (or think I weaseled some controversial wording in), but I don't want to do the work if most people are against the idea in the first place (eg would prefer to wait for OASIS template).



    ------------------------------
    Duncan Sparrell
    Chief Cyber Curmudgeion
    sFractal Consulting LLC
    Oakton VA
    703-828-8646
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Chicken/Egg on getting draft text started

    Posted 05-03-2025 11:33
    Dear members

    On Sat, May 3, 2025, at 15:47, Duncan Sparrell via OASIS wrote:
    > OASIS is updating its templates and we are sort of stuck in a chicken/egg situation. I recommend reading groups.oasis-open.org/discussion/... <https: groups.oasis-open.org discussion markdown-version-of-cscsd-template> and looking at the example. We can help them get it straightened out by going ahead and starting to use it even if it isn't done yet. I think it's important that we start getting text "on paper" (ie agreed to) so we can work out where we have issues that need to be worked.
    >
    > Any objections to my making a PR to 'start' the metadata spec 'ahead of time' (since we don't have the official template yet). Obviously it will just be a PR and people can vote against it if they don't like it (or think I weaseled some controversial wording in), but I don't want to do the work if most people are against the idea in the first place (eg would prefer to wait for OASIS template).
    >
    > Duncan Sparrell [...]

    I understand, that the question posed by this email was
    on objections, and I do not have one against having early
    content focused explorations. Although that may be nice
    to know, why do I respond?

    Well, I want to repeat, that I do not see any rush or
    eagerness needed in such matters (as abbreviations for
    some file-path-parts), or even for some markdown text
    template version.

    1) My co-editor of the verifiable-credentials spec
    asked Kelly (OASIS administration) if we need to
    now use the new templates (albeit for a different format),
    and Kelly responded kindly and pragmatic as always:

    >At some point in the next few months we will require transition
    >over to the new template, but I understand that a lot of TCs
    >have work in progress and I don't want to make it too cumbersome
    >for those who have active development on work products.

    Also, you may have noticed Bret Jordans call for support on
    the markdown text version of the "template", which shows to
    me that this important format is not done yet.
    I also learned from Bret, that as expected, he could delete
    a lot of text from the markdown text, because the other
    formats are mixing in a lot of style stuff we can trust to be
    externally managed through CSS stylesheets for markdown
    rendering to other formats.

    2) one reason for markdown is that it uses space to expose a
    layout in source already and usually leads to a content
    focused style, which can very easily be recast into
    changed OASIS outlines and looks (some shuffling of
    section-files say in a binder and using an updated CSS
    stylesheet, done).

    3) we still have contributions, that are not present
    for example the XML schema and examples. So, any
    explorations will surely not be final.

    4) a spec profits from local examples which in our
    case of data-provenance will be use-cases, right?
    So, we will profit from trying out slicing and dicing
    such normative and informative parts in different
    ways to trial a digestable core spec and unduplicated
    softer documents on use-cases.

    Hope this helps and please all consider "this"
    endeavor not a one mile run but realistically more a marathon.

    Cheers,
    Stefan.




  • 3.  RE: Chicken/Egg on getting draft text started

    Posted 05-03-2025 11:41

    I went ahead and made a draft template. It is as near to new template as I think Board will come out with as I made it from Bret's google doc which he made from the approved doc/html templates. Note the content was agreed to by OASIS Board, it's just the markdown formatting issues on weird equations and stuff like that. I think it's as good a place as any to start. Look at https://github.com/sparrell/dps/blob/spec.md/spec.md to see what I'm talking about. I have not made it a PR because (1) we haven't agreed how to proceed (2) we don't have a place to put it since the work product directory PT is still under discussion. 



    ------------------------------
    Duncan Sparrell
    Chief Cyber Curmudgeion
    sFractal Consulting LLC
    Oakton VA
    703-828-8646
    ------------------------------