Profile

Hi Patrick Can we add OFFICE-4180 to the agenda, please? Kind regards, Francis

Hi Olivier Thanks for a really useful piece of work, which makes it much easier to compare the parameter names chosen by each implementation. Any chance we could have an editable (.ods) version? This would enable us to record our individual preferences and ideas in preparation for further discussion. ...

Dear all I can confirm that the re-submitted Parts 2, 3 and 4 of ODF 1.3 have today been issued by ISO for ballot in JTC 1 as ISO DIS 26300-2, -3 and -4. The ballot period is 12 weeks, so will close in mid-October. In my capacity as Chair of JTC 1/SC 34, I can confirm that we will be pleased to assist ...

Dear all We agreed today that editorial issues found in ODF 1.4 CS01 would only be fixed in ODF 1.4 if other comments from the public review necessitate further revision of the specification. Otherwise they will be fixed in ODF 1.5. This would apply to all the editorial issues that I have identified, ...

Another editorial issue: Part 3, Section 3.11 Cursor Position Setting In the first sentence it is not clear, or consistent with other cases, that "cursor-position" is a string value. Nor is it clear whether this is the PITarget name (see XML 1.0 (5th edition), Section 2.6, production [16]), or ...