Profile

On Friday 16. October 2009 15.19.20 ext Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: > There are no known issues for part 3. Hmm, the 'title' of the meta info says; "OASIS Open Office Specification - Part 3: Packages" At minimum this is confusing, at worst this is incorrectly stating ...

On Wednesday 14. October 2009 10.31.05 ext Peter Junge wrote: > 2) Considering such feature seems to be quite obvious, as well it is > quite easy to add, hence I would like to know if there is a telling > argument, why it hasn't made it into ODF yet? The solution KWord always used for this is using ...

I am a bit surprised why the fo:word-spacing property as defined in XSL[1] is not mentioned in the ODF spec. Is this an oversight? Are odf-writers allowed to just use all 'fo' namespaced properties that are defined upstream? Or maybe we decide to not support this one? (can't find any mention in ...

On Wednesday 18. February 2009 18:36:11 you wrote: > 2009/2/18 Thomas Zander

On Wednesday 18. February 2009 12:06:44 ext Dave Pawson wrote: > In which case I mis-interpreted your first mail, I took it to mean > you wanted *all* ODF apps to save your extension data. Indeed, misinterpretation. Thanks for pointing out the confusion here. I assume that the other points in ...