Profile

I'm assuming the regular weekly call is being held this morning, despite not seeing something noted specifically for today? Thank you, -ben Subhash.Sankuratripati@netapp.com wrote: > Apologies for the delay in sending out the minutes. Please check to ensure > that your attendance has been ...

IANACryptanalyst... and I've not had time to read the report yet, but it appears that there may be a new attack on AES 256. We already know that MD5 and SHA are on the short list for replacement due to weaknesses (hence the Hash Workshop). The below news made me wonder: is KMIP well-positioned to ...

I believe the motion was carried that Anil Saldhana take over as EKMI liaison. On Wed, June 17, 2009 7:12 pm, robert.griffin@rsa.com wrote: > Hi - > > With regard to KMIP action item #16, here is the list of elected > liaisons: > > IEEE P1619.3 - Matt Ball (Sun) > > EKMI - Ben Tomhave (individual) ...

That doesn't really answer the question of why it should be a priority. It seems the focus should be getting the draft into a community standard asap, implemented by 3+ vendors as POC, and then moved into a full standard. Anything that potentially distracts or detracts from that seems to be coun ...

I'm not sure that I agree that this should be a priority. It seems to be more a distraction than anything else. Is there a reason KMIP should be pegged against P1619.3? Just curious why this is seen as important, but mapping to other standards committees is not. -ben -- Benjamin Tomhave, MS, ...