Profile

Contact Details

Ribbons

Badges

Felipe Yamamoto


Contributions

1 to 5 of 7 total
Posted By Felipe Yamamoto 04-04-2018 12:56
Found In Egroup: KMIP-interop-tech
\ view thread
Hi everyone, For anyone that might be interested, attached is Kryptus' spreadsheet with the analysis of the errors. Best regards, On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Tony Cox wrote: Hi Folks, Just a quick reminder that the first (and hopefully only) KMIP interop results review discussion will be held tomorrow ...
Posted By Felipe Yamamoto 03-20-2018 22:48
Found In Egroup: KMIP-interop-tech
\ view thread
Hi Tim, I don't think it's clear. The spec says that the key format type in the Digest indicates the format of the Managed Object . If the Key Format Type (by itself) may vary, why the key format type in the Digest may not? Also, the only updates I can see in the document from the 1.3 to the 1.4 version ...
Posted By Felipe Yamamoto 03-20-2018 19:29
Found In Egroup: KMIP-interop-tech
\ view thread
Hi Mark, From the spec (3.17 Digest): "The Key Format Type field in the Digest attribute indicates the format of the Managed Object from which the Digest Value was calculated." In the previous link (variable items): "12. KeyFormatType a. The key format type selected by the server when it creates managed ...
Posted By Felipe Yamamoto 03-20-2018 19:02
Found In Egroup: KMIP-interop-tech
\ view thread
Hi everyone, We are in a dispute with P6R regarding the Key Format Type returned in the Digest Attribute (for KMIP 1.4). Kryptus Server returns the Key Format Type as Transparent (this was also our behavior in the last year Interop): However, P6R expects the Key Format Type to be exactly ...
Posted By Felipe Yamamoto 03-20-2018 16:32
Found In Egroup: KMIP-interop-tech
\ view thread
Hi Tony, I'm not sure if we should take position in this email thread or if there will be a more formal process... Anyway, Kryptus has not started the tests with Unbound yet, so we are willing to use their new credentials and test sheets. Regards, On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Tony Cox wrote: Hi ...